Thus, .
(b) (5 points) The behavior of y(t) for large t is dominated by the term if C=0 and by the term if . Hence, if , then C ;SPMgt; 0. The y-intercept is . Thus, if C ;SPMgt; 0 then .
Notice that it is linear in x. The tricky way to solve it would be to find x as a function of y. Below we present the more straight-forward method of finding an integrating factor making the equation exact. Set N(x,y)=x+y and . Since and are not equal, the equation is not exact.
Step I: An integrating factor which is a function of y can be found by solving the equation . The equation is equivalent to
Integration of both sides and exponentiation shows that is a solution of (2).
Step II: Set and . The equation
is an exact equation which is equivalent to (1). Indeed . We are looking for a solution defined implicitly by where
Integrating (3) we get that . Equation (4) implies that . Integrating by parts we find that
Hence the general solution is given by .
(b) (5 bonus points) The original equation has the form y'=f(x,y) where is discontinuous along the line y=-x. Both f and its partial are continuous away from this line in . Hence, by the existence and uniqueness Theorem for first order O.D.E's (Theorem 2.4.1 in the text) a point with lies on the graph of precisely one solution. If and then there is no solution through that point because the slope y'=f would be infinite. As for the origin (0,0) we may say that there is no solution because f is not defined at (0,0). Note: A more precise answer (which was not required in order to get the 5 point bonus) is that there is a unique differentiable solution of (1) through the origin given implicitly by choosing C=1. (Exercise: check that it is indeed differentiable!!!)
Assuming that (i.e., and , each of which is a solution) we get the separable equation:
Integrating both sides (using partial fractions ) and exponentiating we get
Substituting back v=y/x and simplifying we get that the general solution is:
Notice that the solution y=2x is obtained when C=0 but the solution y=-2x is not obtained for any value of C. (It can be obtained as the limit of solutions letting .)
has characteristic equation . The two roots are and . We get the two equations and . The general solution is
The initial condition translates to the two equations:
Solving for and we get the solution for the initial value problem
(b) (4 points) If , then must be negative. Thus, the slope satisfies
by plugging each into the equation.
(b),(c) (4 points and 8 points) The solutions f and g are twice-differentiable on and the equation (5) is linear. Hence, any linear combination with constant coefficients
is also a solution. In order to show that it is the general solution, we need to show that f and g are a fundamental set of solutions, i.e., that their Wronskian,
is not zero at some (and hence, by Abel's Theorem, at every) point in . This is clearly the case.
(d) (3 points)
If y(x) is a twice differentiable solution on
then on it must have the form
(by part (c)). Hence, by continuity,
It follows that there does not exist any solution satisfying the initial condition y(0)=1 and y'(0)=2. Note: this does not contradict the Uniqueness and Existence Theorem because if we normalize the equation to the form y'' + p(x)y' + q(x)y = 0 we would get that and are discontinuous at x=0.
(b) (10 points) The general solution is . The initial condition S(0)= 10 yields
Solve the equation to get that . The person would have a million dollars at age 25+60.67=85.67 (Too late to enjoy it!). Note: It is realistic to expect an investment in the stock market to yield an annual profit of . The same person would have a million dollars at age .